一、先回顾一下以前《手搓》线程池Case
- ConcurrencyLevel设置为10
- 并发实现了完美的指数递进关系
- 当时内心还是得到了很大的满足
- 第一批01:58:55.832是1个并发
- 第二批01:58:55.944是2个并发
- 第三批01:58:56.054是4个并发
- 第四批01:58:56.165是8个并发
- 01:58:56.276及以后一段时间达到并发上限10个
- 参考笔者博文《手搓》线程池
- var options = new ReduceOptions { ConcurrencyLevel = 10 };
- var scheduler = new ConcurrentTaskScheduler(options);
- var factory = new TaskFactory(scheduler);
- var jobService = new ConcurrentJobService(scheduler, options);
- jobService.Start();
- Start(factory);
- private void Start(TaskFactory factory)
- {
- for (int i = 1; i < 10; i++)
- {
- for (int j = 1; j < 10; j++)
- {
- int a = i, b = j;
- factory.StartNew(() => Multiply(a, b));
- }
- }
- }
- public int Multiply(int a, int b)
- {
- var result = a * b;
- _output.WriteLine($"{a} x {b} = {result},{DateTime.Now:HH:mm:ss.fff}");
- Thread.Sleep(100);
- return result;
- }
- // 1 x 1 = 1,01:58:55.832
- // 1 x 2 = 2,01:58:55.944
- // 1 x 3 = 3,01:58:55.944
- // 1 x 4 = 4,01:58:56.054
- // 1 x 5 = 5,01:58:56.054
- // 1 x 6 = 6,01:58:56.054
- // 1 x 7 = 7,01:58:56.054
- // 1 x 8 = 8,01:58:56.165
- // 1 x 9 = 9,01:58:56.165
- // 2 x 1 = 2,01:58:56.165
- // 2 x 3 = 6,01:58:56.165
- // 2 x 2 = 4,01:58:56.165
- // 2 x 4 = 8,01:58:56.165
- // 2 x 5 = 10,01:58:56.165
- // 2 x 6 = 12,01:58:56.165
- // 2 x 8 = 16,01:58:56.276
- // 2 x 9 = 18,01:58:56.276
- // 3 x 2 = 6,01:58:56.276
- // 2 x 7 = 14,01:58:56.276
- // 3 x 3 = 9,01:58:56.276
- // 3 x 1 = 3,01:58:56.276
- // 3 x 4 = 12,01:58:56.276
- // 3 x 5 = 15,01:58:56.276
- // 3 x 6 = 18,01:58:56.277
- // 3 x 7 = 21,01:58:56.277
- // 4 x 1 = 4,01:58:56.388
- // 3 x 8 = 24,01:58:56.388
- // 3 x 9 = 27,01:58:56.388
- // 4 x 2 = 8,01:58:56.388
- // 4 x 6 = 24,01:58:56.388
- // 4 x 3 = 12,01:58:56.388
- // 4 x 5 = 20,01:58:56.388
- // 4 x 8 = 32,01:58:56.388
- // 4 x 4 = 16,01:58:56.388
- // 4 x 7 = 28,01:58:56.388
- // 5 x 8 = 40,01:58:56.500
- // 5 x 4 = 20,01:58:56.500
- // 5 x 9 = 45,01:58:56.500
- // 5 x 2 = 10,01:58:56.500
- // 5 x 7 = 35,01:58:56.500
- // 5 x 6 = 30,01:58:56.500
- // 4 x 9 = 36,01:58:56.500
- // 5 x 5 = 25,01:58:56.500
- // 5 x 1 = 5,01:58:56.500
- // 5 x 3 = 15,01:58:56.500
- // 6 x 5 = 30,01:58:56.612
- // 6 x 2 = 12,01:58:56.612
- // 6 x 1 = 6,01:58:56.612
- // 6 x 3 = 18,01:58:56.612
- // 6 x 6 = 36,01:58:56.612
- // 6 x 7 = 42,01:58:56.612
- // 6 x 4 = 24,01:58:56.612
- // 6 x 8 = 48,01:58:56.612
- // 6 x 9 = 54,01:58:56.612
- // 7 x 1 = 7,01:58:56.612
- // 7 x 2 = 14,01:58:56.724
- // 8 x 1 = 8,01:58:56.724
- // 7 x 4 = 28,01:58:56.724
- // 7 x 7 = 49,01:58:56.724
- // 7 x 5 = 35,01:58:56.724
- // 8 x 2 = 16,01:58:56.724
- // 7 x 8 = 56,01:58:56.724
- // 7 x 6 = 42,01:58:56.724
- // 7 x 9 = 63,01:58:56.724
- // 7 x 3 = 21,01:58:56.724
- // 8 x 5 = 40,01:58:56.836
- // 8 x 8 = 64,01:58:56.836
- // 9 x 1 = 9,01:58:56.836
- // 9 x 2 = 18,01:58:56.836
- // 8 x 7 = 56,01:58:56.836
- // 8 x 9 = 72,01:58:56.836
- // 8 x 3 = 24,01:58:56.836
- // 8 x 6 = 48,01:58:56.836
- // 9 x 3 = 27,01:58:56.836
- // 8 x 4 = 32,01:58:56.836
- // 9 x 5 = 45,01:58:56.948
- // 9 x 7 = 63,01:58:56.948
- // 9 x 4 = 36,01:58:56.948
- // 9 x 6 = 54,01:58:56.948
- // 9 x 9 = 81,01:58:56.948
- // 9 x 8 = 72,01:58:56.948
复制代码 二、短暂的快乐被异步并发测试给打破了
- ConcurrencyLevel设置为4
- 一开始就是4个清晰可见的并发
- 一发入魂,开局即是高潮
- 第一感觉是bug
- 第二感觉是偶发事件
- 笔者多次测试,并反复Review代码,都没发现其中的蹊跷
- 参考笔者博文《手搓》TaskFactory带你安全的起飞
- var options = new ReduceOptions { ConcurrencyLevel = 4 };
- var factory = new ConcurrentTaskFactory(options);
- _output.WriteLine($"begin {DateTime.Now:HH:mm:ss.fff}");
- Stopwatch sw = Stopwatch.StartNew();
- List<Task<Product>> tasks = new(100);
- for (int i = 0; i < 100; i++)
- {
- var id = i;
- var task = factory.StartTask(() => GetProductAsync(id));
- tasks.Add(task);
- }
- var products = await Task.WhenAll(tasks);
- sw.Stop();
- _output.WriteLine($"end {DateTime.Now:HH:mm:ss.fff}, Elapsed {sw.ElapsedMilliseconds}");
- Assert.NotNull(products);
- Assert.Equal(100, products.Length);
- // begin 10:20:45.317
- // Thread36 GetProductAsync(0),10:20:45.487
- // Thread11 GetProductAsync(2),10:20:45.487
- // Thread8 GetProductAsync(3),10:20:45.487
- // Thread35 GetProductAsync(1),10:20:45.487
- // Thread11 GetProductAsync(6),10:20:45.614
- // Thread35 GetProductAsync(4),10:20:45.614
- // Thread8 GetProductAsync(7),10:20:45.614
- // Thread36 GetProductAsync(5),10:20:45.614
- // Thread35 GetProductAsync(9),10:20:45.742
- // Thread8 GetProductAsync(8),10:20:45.742
- // Thread41 GetProductAsync(11),10:20:45.742
- // Thread37 GetProductAsync(10),10:20:45.742
- // Thread37 GetProductAsync(12),10:20:45.869
- // Thread8 GetProductAsync(14),10:20:45.869
- // Thread11 GetProductAsync(13),10:20:45.869
- // Thread41 GetProductAsync(15),10:20:45.869
- // Thread8 GetProductAsync(18),10:20:45.997
- // Thread35 GetProductAsync(17),10:20:45.997
- // Thread41 GetProductAsync(19),10:20:45.997
- // Thread11 GetProductAsync(16),10:20:45.997
- // Thread11 GetProductAsync(20),10:20:46.125
- // Thread8 GetProductAsync(22),10:20:46.125
- // Thread35 GetProductAsync(21),10:20:46.125
- // Thread41 GetProductAsync(23),10:20:46.125
- // Thread37 GetProductAsync(27),10:20:46.253
- // Thread41 GetProductAsync(26),10:20:46.253
- // Thread35 GetProductAsync(25),10:20:46.253
- // Thread11 GetProductAsync(24),10:20:46.253
- // Thread35 GetProductAsync(29),10:20:46.381
- // Thread41 GetProductAsync(28),10:20:46.381
- // Thread11 GetProductAsync(31),10:20:46.381
- // Thread37 GetProductAsync(30),10:20:46.381
- // Thread8 GetProductAsync(32),10:20:46.507
- // Thread37 GetProductAsync(34),10:20:46.507
- // Thread41 GetProductAsync(35),10:20:46.507
- // Thread11 GetProductAsync(33),10:20:46.507
- // Thread37 GetProductAsync(39),10:20:46.635
- // Thread11 GetProductAsync(37),10:20:46.635
- // Thread41 GetProductAsync(36),10:20:46.635
- // Thread35 GetProductAsync(38),10:20:46.635
- // Thread41 GetProductAsync(40),10:20:46.763
- // Thread37 GetProductAsync(41),10:20:46.763
- // Thread35 GetProductAsync(42),10:20:46.763
- // Thread11 GetProductAsync(43),10:20:46.763
- // Thread41 GetProductAsync(47),10:20:46.891
- // Thread8 GetProductAsync(44),10:20:46.891
- // Thread11 GetProductAsync(46),10:20:46.891
- // Thread37 GetProductAsync(45),10:20:46.891
- // Thread37 GetProductAsync(51),10:20:47.018
- // Thread8 GetProductAsync(49),10:20:47.018
- // Thread41 GetProductAsync(48),10:20:47.018
- // Thread11 GetProductAsync(50),10:20:47.018
- // Thread41 GetProductAsync(55),10:20:47.146
- // Thread11 GetProductAsync(54),10:20:47.146
- // Thread8 GetProductAsync(52),10:20:47.146
- // Thread37 GetProductAsync(53),10:20:47.146
- // Thread11 GetProductAsync(59),10:20:47.274
- // Thread8 GetProductAsync(58),10:20:47.274
- // Thread37 GetProductAsync(56),10:20:47.274
- // Thread41 GetProductAsync(57),10:20:47.274
- // Thread41 GetProductAsync(62),10:20:47.402
- // Thread11 GetProductAsync(63),10:20:47.402
- // Thread37 GetProductAsync(60),10:20:47.402
- // Thread8 GetProductAsync(61),10:20:47.402
- // Thread41 GetProductAsync(66),10:20:47.530
- // Thread88 GetProductAsync(64),10:20:47.530
- // Thread35 GetProductAsync(65),10:20:47.530
- // Thread11 GetProductAsync(67),10:20:47.530
- // Thread11 GetProductAsync(68),10:20:47.658
- // Thread41 GetProductAsync(70),10:20:47.658
- // Thread8 GetProductAsync(69),10:20:47.658
- // Thread35 GetProductAsync(71),10:20:47.658
- // Thread41 GetProductAsync(74),10:20:47.786
- // Thread95 GetProductAsync(75),10:20:47.786
- // Thread35 GetProductAsync(73),10:20:47.786
- // Thread88 GetProductAsync(72),10:20:47.786
- // Thread95 GetProductAsync(78),10:20:47.914
- // Thread41 GetProductAsync(77),10:20:47.914
- // Thread88 GetProductAsync(79),10:20:47.914
- // Thread8 GetProductAsync(76),10:20:47.914
- // Thread95 GetProductAsync(80),10:20:48.042
- // Thread41 GetProductAsync(83),10:20:48.042
- // Thread8 GetProductAsync(82),10:20:48.042
- // Thread35 GetProductAsync(81),10:20:48.042
- // Thread95 GetProductAsync(84),10:20:48.170
- // Thread35 GetProductAsync(86),10:20:48.170
- // Thread41 GetProductAsync(85),10:20:48.170
- // Thread8 GetProductAsync(87),10:20:48.170
- // Thread11 GetProductAsync(90),10:20:48.297
- // Thread88 GetProductAsync(88),10:20:48.297
- // Thread8 GetProductAsync(89),10:20:48.297
- // Thread35 GetProductAsync(91),10:20:48.297
- // Thread11 GetProductAsync(95),10:20:48.425
- // Thread8 GetProductAsync(94),10:20:48.425
- // Thread41 GetProductAsync(93),10:20:48.425
- // Thread35 GetProductAsync(92),10:20:48.425
- // Thread41 GetProductAsync(98),10:20:48.553
- // Thread35 GetProductAsync(99),10:20:48.553
- // Thread8 GetProductAsync(97),10:20:48.553
- // Thread88 GetProductAsync(96),10:20:48.553
- // end 10:20:48.553, Elapsed 3235
复制代码 三、进一步优化的空间
- 傍晚在小区边的小湖散步就反复思考异步并发的问题
- 如果把异步线程等同同步线程,在异步线程未执行完就激活了新的线程
- 由于激活前这个过程足够快导致线程叠加
- 造成开局即是高潮的"假象"
1. 《手搓》线程池核心代码
- 异步时_processor.Run的耗时可以忽略不计
- 如何能实现同步和异步同样的效果
- while (true)
- {
- if (_processor.Run())
- {
- _pool.Increment();
- }
- else
- {
- await Task.Delay(_reduceTime, CancellationToken.None)
- .ConfigureAwait(false);
- }
- if (token.IsCancellationRequested)
- break;
- }
复制代码 2. 以上想明白后就好优化了
- 优化后的代码
- 把_processor.Run()拆分processor.TryTake(out var item)和processor.Run(ref item)
- 先发现任务,激活线程再执行
- 有人可能会说,你这代码逻辑有问题啊
- 发现任务也只是证明本线程有事可干,激活新线程明显浪费资源啊
- 这点确实应该说一下
- 现实经验告诉我们,如果发现1只蟑螂,很可能你家已经成为了蟑螂窝
- 就算激活一个线程没事可干消耗也不大,TryTake返回false就直接走线程回收逻辑了
- while (true)
- {
- if (processor.TryTake(out var item))
- {
- _pool.Increment();
- processor.Run(ref item);
- }
- else
- {
- await Task.Delay(_reduceTime, CancellationToken.None)
- .ConfigureAwait(false);
- }
- if (token.IsCancellationRequested)
- break;
- }
复制代码 3. 优化后再把第一个同步Case重跑一遍
- ConcurrencyLevel设置为10
- 同步方法也实现了一发入魂,开局即使高潮
- 必需承认完美的指数递进关系很有数学美
- 但笔者做为一个码奴,追求程序性能才是终极目标
- var options = new ReduceOptions { ConcurrencyLevel = 10 };
- var scheduler = new ConcurrentTaskScheduler(options);
- var factory = new TaskFactory(scheduler);
- var jobService = new ConcurrentJobService(scheduler, options);
- jobService.Start();
- Start(factory);
- private void Start(TaskFactory factory)
- {
- for (int i = 1; i < 10; i++)
- {
- for (int j = 1; j < 10; j++)
- {
- int a = i, b = j;
- factory.StartNew(() => Multiply(a, b));
- }
- }
- }
- public int Multiply(int a, int b)
- {
- var result = a * b;
- _output.WriteLine($"{a} x {b} = {result},{DateTime.Now:HH:mm:ss.fff}");
- Thread.Sleep(100);
- return result;
- }
- // 1 x 6 = 6,09:15:35.332
- // 1 x 3 = 3,09:15:35.332
- // 1 x 2 = 2,09:15:35.332
- // 1 x 4 = 4,09:15:35.332
- // 1 x 5 = 5,09:15:35.332
- // 1 x 9 = 9,09:15:35.333
- // 1 x 7 = 7,09:15:35.333
- // 1 x 8 = 8,09:15:35.333
- // 1 x 1 = 1,09:15:35.332
- // 2 x 1 = 2,09:15:35.333
- // 2 x 6 = 12,09:15:35.443
- // 2 x 3 = 6,09:15:35.443
- // 2 x 7 = 14,09:15:35.443
- // 2 x 4 = 8,09:15:35.443
- // 2 x 8 = 16,09:15:35.443
- // 2 x 5 = 10,09:15:35.443
- // 2 x 2 = 4,09:15:35.443
- // 2 x 9 = 18,09:15:35.443
- // 3 x 1 = 3,09:15:35.443
- // 3 x 2 = 6,09:15:35.444
- // 4 x 3 = 12,09:15:35.554
- // 3 x 4 = 12,09:15:35.554
- // 3 x 5 = 15,09:15:35.554
- // 3 x 3 = 9,09:15:35.554
- // 3 x 7 = 21,09:15:35.554
- // 3 x 9 = 27,09:15:35.554
- // 4 x 1 = 4,09:15:35.554
- // 3 x 8 = 24,09:15:35.554
- // 3 x 6 = 18,09:15:35.554
- // 4 x 2 = 8,09:15:35.554
- // 4 x 6 = 24,09:15:35.666
- // 5 x 4 = 20,09:15:35.666
- // 4 x 8 = 32,09:15:35.666
- // 4 x 9 = 36,09:15:35.666
- // 4 x 7 = 28,09:15:35.666
- // 5 x 3 = 15,09:15:35.666
- // 4 x 4 = 16,09:15:35.666
- // 5 x 2 = 10,09:15:35.666
- // 5 x 1 = 5,09:15:35.666
- // 4 x 5 = 20,09:15:35.666
- // 5 x 6 = 30,09:15:35.777
- // 6 x 1 = 6,09:15:35.777
- // 6 x 5 = 30,09:15:35.777
- // 6 x 4 = 24,09:15:35.777
- // 5 x 9 = 45,09:15:35.777
- // 5 x 5 = 25,09:15:35.777
- // 6 x 2 = 12,09:15:35.777
- // 5 x 8 = 40,09:15:35.777
- // 5 x 7 = 35,09:15:35.777
- // 6 x 3 = 18,09:15:35.777
- // 6 x 9 = 54,09:15:35.888
- // 6 x 8 = 48,09:15:35.888
- // 7 x 1 = 7,09:15:35.888
- // 6 x 7 = 42,09:15:35.888
- // 6 x 6 = 36,09:15:35.888
- // 7 x 6 = 42,09:15:35.888
- // 7 x 4 = 28,09:15:35.888
- // 7 x 3 = 21,09:15:35.888
- // 7 x 5 = 35,09:15:35.888
- // 7 x 2 = 14,09:15:35.888
- // 7 x 8 = 56,09:15:36.000
- // 7 x 7 = 49,09:15:36.000
- // 7 x 9 = 63,09:15:36.000
- // 8 x 1 = 8,09:15:36.000
- // 8 x 7 = 56,09:15:36.000
- // 8 x 2 = 16,09:15:36.000
- // 8 x 3 = 24,09:15:36.000
- // 8 x 5 = 40,09:15:36.000
- // 8 x 6 = 48,09:15:36.000
- // 8 x 4 = 32,09:15:36.000
- // 8 x 8 = 64,09:15:36.112
- // 8 x 9 = 72,09:15:36.112
- // 9 x 2 = 18,09:15:36.112
- // 9 x 1 = 9,09:15:36.112
- // 9 x 3 = 27,09:15:36.112
- // 9 x 4 = 36,09:15:36.112
- // 9 x 5 = 45,09:15:36.112
- // 9 x 7 = 63,09:15:36.112
- // 9 x 6 = 54,09:15:36.112
- // 9 x 8 = 72,09:15:36.112
- // 9 x 9 = 81,09:15:36.223
复制代码 4. 线程池执行同步方法开局即使高潮重要吗
- 当然重要,这就是冷启动的速度问题
- 如果用TaskFactory对同步方法做并发操作就更显得重要了
- GetProduct同步方法执行1次耗时0.1秒
- ConcurrencyLevel设置为7
- 现在优化后获取7条只要0.1秒
- 如果冷启动按指数递进关系要至少要0.3秒多
- 这就快了3倍了
- 如果ConcurrencyLevel越大,效果就越明显
- var options = new ReduceOptions { ConcurrencyLevel = 7 };
- var factory = new ConcurrentTaskFactory(options);
- _output.WriteLine($"begin {DateTime.Now:HH:mm:ss.fff}");
- Stopwatch sw = Stopwatch.StartNew();
- List<Task<Product>> tasks = new(7);
- for (int i = 0; i < 7; i++)
- {
- var id = i;
- var task = factory.StartNew(() => GetProduct(id));
- tasks.Add(task);
- }
- var products = await Task.WhenAll(tasks);
- sw.Stop();
- _output.WriteLine($"end {DateTime.Now:HH:mm:ss.fff}, Elapsed {sw.ElapsedMilliseconds}");
- internal Product GetProduct(int id)
- {
- Thread.Sleep(100);
- _output.WriteLine($"Thread{Environment.CurrentManagedThreadId} GetProductAsync({id}),{DateTime.Now:HH:mm:ss.fff}");
- return new(id);
- }
- // begin 09:52:02.916
- // Thread36 GetProductAsync(5),09:52:03.079
- // Thread32 GetProductAsync(1),09:52:03.079
- // Thread33 GetProductAsync(2),09:52:03.079
- // Thread37 GetProductAsync(6),09:52:03.079
- // Thread34 GetProductAsync(3),09:52:03.079
- // Thread35 GetProductAsync(4),09:52:03.079
- // Thread8 GetProductAsync(0),09:52:03.079
- // end 09:52:03.079, Elapsed 162
复制代码 好了,就介绍到这里,更多信息请查看源码库
源码托管地址: https://github.com/donetsoftwork/HandCore.net ,欢迎大家直接查看源码。
gitee同步更新:https://gitee.com/donetsoftwork/HandCore.net
如果大家喜欢请动动您发财的小手手帮忙点一下Star,谢谢!!!
来源:程序园用户自行投稿发布,如果侵权,请联系站长删除
免责声明:如果侵犯了您的权益,请联系站长,我们会及时删除侵权内容,谢谢合作! |